Here:
Home
>
Classroom
>
Social Studies
>
Government
>
Progressive Views
>
Framing the Questions
Framing the Questions
Papers
- -Editorial: Congressional Progressive Caucus Gains Focus (TheNation.com)
"In this special issue of The Nation, twenty members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus take on the daunting foreign and domestic policy challenges facing the United States in year six of the Bush/Cheney Administration. They offer road maps to renewal that are both principled and pragmatic. In the words of the senior member of the caucus, Representative John Conyers, these House members are expressing 'a clear vision for America. Ours is not the Bush agenda of the radical right nor the flaccid flounderings of Democrats. We have a fresh, vigorous alternative, and we're going to present a plan for an activist government dedicated to serving all Americans.' " 01-06
- -Editorial: Conservative and Liberal Views of Morality Collide (Lakoff)
"Conservatives understand that morality and the family are at the heart of their politics, as they are at the heart of most politics. What is sad is that liberals have not yet reached a similar level of political sophistication."
"While conservatives understand that all of their policies have a single unified origin, liberals understand their own political conceptual universe so badly that they still think of it in terms of coalitions of interest groups. Where conservatives have organized for an overall, unified onslaught on liberal culture, liberals are fragmented into isolated interest groups, based on superficial localized issues: labor, the rights of ethnic groups, feminism, gay rights, environmentalism, abortion rights, homelessness, health care, education, the arts, and so on. This failure to see a unified picture of liberal politics has led to a divided consciousness and has allowed conservatives to employ a divide-and-conquer strategy."
"The family-based morality that structures liberal thought is diametrically opposed to Strict Father morality. It centers around the Nurturant Parent model of the family."
"Not only is there no unified liberal political structure, but there is no overall effective liberal rhetoric to counter the carefully constructed conservative rhetoric. Where conservatives have carefully coined terms and images and repeated them until they have entered the popular lexicon, liberals have not done the same. Liberals need to go beyond coalitions of interest groups to consciously construct a unified language and imagery to convey their worldview. This will not be easy, and they are 30 years behind." 9-05
- Editorial - Analysis of Defeat (AlterNet.org - Arianna Huffington)
"This election was not stolen. It was lost by the Kerry campaign. The reason it's so important to make this crystal clear – even as Kerry's concession speech is still ringing in our ears – is that to the victors go not only the spoils but the explanations. And the Republicans are framing their victory as the triumph of conservative moral values and the wedge cultural issues they exploited throughout the campaign."
"But it wasn't gay marriage that did the Democrats in; it was the fatal decision to make the pursuit of undecided voters the overarching strategy of the Kerry campaign."
"This meant that at every turn the campaign chose caution over boldness so as not to offend the undecideds who, as a group, long to be soothed and reassured rather than challenged and inspired." 10-04
- Framing the Issue of Judicial Nominees for Democrats (FrameShop - Feldman)
"The idea is for Reid to give a speech that reframes the very idea of voting through the metaphor of 'voting is standing with the people,' as opposed to this 'up or down' frame being pushed by the GOP."
"No matter how angry Dems get, the GOP will continue to hold the debate so long as they are allowed to frame the very idea of what the Senate is about."
"The purpose of a Senator is not to simply stand with the President. Senators stand with the people. It says so in the Seventeenth Amendment and it is time to remind Americans of this idea in a clear, loud, and unified voice." 6-05
- Framing the Metaphor of "Nation" (Rockridge Institute)
"Part One in a series of articles outlining the metaphorical structures behind liberalism and conservatism, this memo describes how metaphors affect the way we reason, and why this matters in politics."
"In American culture there are two opposed and idealized models of the family, the Nurturant Parent model and the Strict Father model. The metaphor of the Nation as a Family maps the values and relationships from those family models onto our politics, creating 'liberal' and 'conservative' political positions that we understand through our models of family structure." 6-05
- Interview with Frank Luntz: Using Persuasive Words (PBS.org - Frontline)
"This is not about politics; this is not about selling soap. This is taking very traditional, simple, clear-cut words of the English language and figuring out which words, which phrases to apply at which opportunities, which times." 05-07
- Metaphors We Live By (TheLiteraryLink.com - Lakoff and Johnson)
"Research inspired by self-categorization theory, then, suggests that inducing group members to replace cross-cutting demographic or functional categories with the inclusive workgroup boundary as the basis for social categorization will reduce the detrimental effects of intergroup biases (Kramer and Brewer, 1984; Gaertner et al., 1989; Polzer, Stewart, and Simmons, 1999). Such a recategorization should cause workgroup members to replace their personalized self-conception with a cognitive representation of themselves (and other group members) as embodiments of a workgroup prototype (Hogg and Terry, 2000). Such depersonalization heightens group members' perceived similarities and attenuates their perceived differences (Turner, 1985), reducing the detrimental effects of categorical diversity." 11-04
- We Think in Metaphors (TeachersMind.com)
"Linguist George Lakoff and philosopher Mark Johnson provide convincing evidence that metaphors may actually be people’s primary mode of mental operation. They argue that because the mind is 'embodied'—that is, it experiences the world through the body in which it resides—people can't help but conceptualize the world in terms of bodily perceptions." 11-04
|
Back to
Top

-Copyright © 1996-2007 EDI
and Dr. R. Jerry Adams-
|